From Excel to Agile:

Transforming Product Management with Prioritization Tools

Moving Beyond Spreadsheets

Excel remains a cornerstone for visualizing CSV exports, merging data from non-integrated systems, and leveraging features like VLOOKUP an enduring favorite of business analysts including myself. However, its limitations become evident in modern product management workflows. Excel wasn’t built for extensive text handling, dynamic multi channel collaboration, or uncluttered real-time updates. As agile methodologies prioritize adaptability and teamwork, integrating tools like Jira or other prioritization software offers a more efficient path. These tools minimize burnout and save time by addressing the user experience gaps between functions, in particular varying tollerance to visual clutter, version control, centralized resource alignmnent and excessive copy pasting.

Why Transition from Excel to Jira or equivalent?

Excel remains a practical tool for stitching data together when direct SQL access isn’t available or for handling occasional ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) tasks. However, it’s not built for managing detailed text or supporting documents effectively. In Agile environments, where priorities and backlogs constantly evolve, specialized tools designed for Agile workflows such as Jira are far more effective. These tools streamline sprint planning, backlog management, and team collaboration by offering a shared, real-time platform. For product managers and product owners, integrating Jira with visual tools like Lucid Spark enhances clarity, creating more "blank space" around features which simplifies workflow visualization. This approach fosters transparency in task progress and blockers, enabling teams to adapt more readily to changes.

With almost two decades of working with Jira, I can tell you Jira doesn’t magically manage everything by itself. It’s a powerful tool, but without someone steering the ship, things can get chaotic fast. Product Owners are best placed in the funnel to approve Jira setup and configuration. The Product Owner's role crosses multiple functions and has a unique understanding of each team's needs, ensuring everyone gets value from the setup.

Product Managers, are often not the type to have a hundred tabs open, but they do need quick snapshots of priorities. They should like clarity without clutter. Product owners on the other hand understand that it is unavoidable that there will be thought chunks littered everywhere but that does not mean that they want to live like a data hoarder. Important to the Product Owner is Jira’s drag-and-drop features and customizable colour coded ordering allowing them to bubble up higher priority tasks, whilst ignoring the distractions below the page break until its time to dig deeper. Features and Stories can be color-coded, sorted, and organized, giving a bird’s eye view, helping to keep focus on the most crucial items.

In an ideal setup, the reality that priorities may need to be planned across multiple sprints is conisdered, so that visualization of dependencies and resource limits can be identified more easily. This process makes applying methods like merge sorting or the Kano model more intuitive and less clunky. As features are broken down into stories and tasks, Product Owners naturally fall into identifiying “must be“ items, to be a quality product, “performance Quality features” the more the customer gets the happier they will be, “attractive features”, the customer is interested but its not a deal breaker, “indifferent quality features”, the customer is not stirred by these and “reverse quality features” you are repelling them from your product with these, all while keeping everything agile and adaptable.

Insights from Setting Up Jira from a Spreadsheet of Requirements

Moving from Excel to Jira isn’t as simple as “import and go” it’s a shift that often digs deep into how requirements are collected, organized and valued. Every time I’ve transitioned teams from Excel to Jira, the first thing I do is question: Are we moving forward or just recreating our old system in a new tool? Too often, requirements lists are like puzzle pieces thrown in a box, with limited indications to their order and no clear connection to goals.

What works is breaking down those lists, grouping by user needs rather than technical actions. I use flow diagrams to map out each interaction, creating a visual that tells a story beyond each line item. This helps cut away “must-have” features that are really just comfortable routines we’ve outgrown. With this groundwork, we can build Agile workflows that deliver genuine value, not just duplicate old habits.

Seeing the big picture is everything here only then can Jira become a platform for growth instead of just a better spreadsheet.

Enhancing Agile Workflows with Prioritization Tools

Jira’s powerful features enhance Agile workflows in several ways, these are some of my favorites:

• Real-Time Collaboration: Tools like Jira offers messaging triggers and integrations that keep all team members informed. Comments, status updates, and task assignments are visible to everyone, fostering better communication.
• Backlog Management: Jira’s backlog feature enables easy prioritization of stories with clear color co-ordinated feature grouping allowing Product Owners to quickly assess and adjust priorities based on business needs.
• Sprint Planning: Jira’s sprint planning tools offer drag-and-drop task management, enabling quick adjustments and effective sprint organization.

Metrics and Reporting: Moving Beyond Manual Calculations

Reliance on manual data entry and analysis has some benefits because it allows better connectedness with the data and adjacent values. Long term automated reporting is a must, due to the time it takes to process and present manual reports.

• Burndown Charts: These visualizations are my go to report for periodic checks that the team has what they need. If the line is not working its way downwards showing a steady pace and capacity there is likely missing domain knowledge that needs rounding up.
• Velocity Reports: With Jira, velocity reports are automatically generated, offering insights that enable planning where team skills need to be augmented.

Questions for Further Exploration

• What challenges do teams encounter when transitioning from Excel to Jira, especially under Agile methodologies?

Transitioning from Excel to Jira presents both technical and cultural challenges for teams. Excel’s longstanding familiarity and flexibility have made it a cornerstone tool in many organizations, with leadership often relying on structured, template-based reports for consistent updates. Moving to Jira, especially under Agile methodologies, requires a significant shift in processes and mindsets. Here is a short list of road bumps to be aware of.

1. Learning Curve

   Jira introduces dynamic, "self-serve" dashboards and iterative updates, which can feel less intuitive to stakeholders accustomed to Excel's static reports.

2. Cultural Resistance

   Teams often struggle with Agile's emphasis on regular feedback loops, real-time collaboration, and continuous progress monitoring. Those used to traditional workflows may resist changing established habits.

3. Loss of Standardization

   Excel offers customizable templates tailored to management preferences. Jira's default workflows may initially lack this personalization, leading to dissatisfaction.

4. Risk of Silos

   If stakeholders fail to embrace Agile practices, teams might revert to isolated, segmented work styles, reducing the cross-functional alignment that Jira aims to foster.

• How Can Product Managers Address Resistance from Stakeholders Who Prefer Excel?

Handling resistance to new tools like Jira is often best achieved through demonstration rather than direct persuasion. Product Owners can employ the following strategies:

1. Show Live Benefits:

   When stakeholders inquire about project progress, display a live burn-down chart or velocity report directly in Jira. This visualization highlights real-time updates and actionable insights.

2. Integrate Their Contributions:

   If stakeholders provide supporting documents, attach them to a Jira story in real-time during a meeting. This demonstrates how Jira can centralize and streamline documentation.

3. Highlight Transparency:

   Use Jira’s features to illustrate enhanced visibility into tasks, deadlines, and team productivity. This approach allows stakeholders to see how the tool improves collaboration without forcing them to adopt it immediately.

   As a Product Owner you have to come to terms with the vice, which is where trouble leans in on you from both sides

   By subtly showcasing Jira's value during routine interactions, stakeholders can see its benefits firsthand. This makes it easier for them to adopt the tool willingly, rather than feeling pressured into change.

Subscribe to Richard Smith

Experienced Product Manager & Agile Leader

* indicates required

Email Address *

First Name

Phone Number

Download Resume

Conclusion: Embracing Agile with Jira

Traditional tools often display data in a static, unchanging format, where information sits in rows and columns, like a giant digital filing cabinet. While useful for storage, this setup limits flexibility when it comes to prioritizing, collaborating, and adapting data for decision-making. Modern prioritization tools, by contrast, transform this static approach into a dynamic one. Features like drag-and-drop functionality let you physically move items around, allowing users to rearrange tasks and visualize changes immediately, which helps keep priorities clear and adaptable as projects progress.

Color coding adds another layer of clarity, visually distinguishing between priority levels, types, or statuses of tasks making it easy to see what needs immediate attention. The option to attach supporting documents and notes to items further enriches the context, allowing each task to carry all its relevant details and history. This fluid and interactive setup empowers teams to manage tasks in real time, supporting collaboration, accountability, and faster, more informed decision making.